Thursday, November 4, 2010

Scientific American Poll: 81% think the IPCC is Corrupt, with Group-think & Political Agenda

'Scientific' American may regret taking their recent opinion poll on the state of climate science given the eye-opening results cast by their "scientifically literate" readership. With a total of 5190 respondents, a consensus of 81.3% think the IPCC is "a corrupt organization, prone to group-think, with a political agenda" and 75% think climate change is caused by solar variation or natural processes vs. 21% who think it is due to greenhouse gases from human activity. 65% think we should do nothing about climate change since "we are powerless to stop it," and the same percentage think science should stay out of politics. When asked, "How much would you be willing to pay to forestall the risk of catastrophic climate change?," 76.7% said "nothing."



Poll results hidden here



Climate of Change?

1. Should climate scientists discuss scientific uncertainty in mainstream forums?

No, that would play into the hands of the fossil-fuel lobby. 3.0% 157

Yes, it would help engage the citizenry. 90.1% 4,673

Maybe—but only via serious venues like PBS's the NewsHour and The New York Times. 6.9% 358

answered question 5,188

skipped question 2



2. Judith Curry is:

a peacemaker. 69.1% 3,585

a dupe. 7.6% 392

both. 4.3% 224

I've never heard of her. 19.0% 987

answered question 5,188

skipped question 2



3. What is causing climate change?

greenhouse gases from human activity 30.9% 1,602

solar variation 33.1% 1,718

natural processes 75.8% 3,934

There is no climate change. 6.2% 320

answered question 5,188

skipped question 2



4. The IPCC, or Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change is:

an effective group of government representatives, scientists and other experts. 18.0% 932

a corrupt organization, prone to groupthink, with a political agenda. 81.3% 4,220

something to do with Internet protocols. 0.7% 36

answered question 5,188

skipped question 2



5. What should we do about climate change?

Nothing, we are powerless to stop it. 65.4% 3,394

Use more technology (geoengineering, carbon capture and storage). 16.7% 865

Use less technology (cars, intensive agriculture). 5.8% 303

Switch to carbon-free energy sources as much as possible and adapt to changes already underway. 29.5% 1,528

answered question 5,188

skipped question 2



6. What is "climate sensitivity"?

the degree to which global temperature responds to concentrations of greenhouse gases 32.6% 1,692

an unknown variable that climate scientists still do not understand 52.2% 2,708

the phrase on which the fate of human civilization hangs 0.6% 30

all of the above 14.6% 758

answered question 5,188

skipped question 2



7. Which policy options do you support?

a carbon tax 15.1% 781

cap and trade (a price on carbon via an overall limit on emissions paired with some form of market for such pollution permits) 8.5% 441

increased government funding of energy-related technology research and development 38.8% 2,015

cap and dividend, in which the proceeds of auctioning pollution permits are rebated to taxpayers 6.6% 343

keeping science out of the political process 65.1% 3,375

answered question 5,188

skipped question 2



8. How much would you be willing to pay to forestall the risk of catastrophic climate change?

a 50 percent increase in electricity bills 3.8% 195

a doubling of gasoline prices 5.5% 286

nothing 76.7% 3,981

whatever it takes 14.0% 726

answered question 5,188

skipped question 2



Find...
Show replies
Hide replies

No comments:

Post a Comment